Env: ALL

Executive Status

EnvEnvironment partition: dev, int, stg, or prod.
GoalConfigured success target and run scope for this environment. INT/STG/PROD use all E2E job runs. DEV uses post-good runs plus Tide batches: runs on the final commit of a PR that later merged, or batch retests of PRs that passed their individual e2e-parallel checks.
RunsNumber of job runs in the selected goal definition for this environment.
SuccessSuccess rate on the selected goal definition: (runs - failed runs) / runs * 100.
Gap vs targetDifference in percentage points between current success and the configured target rate.
Change vs prevHow much the success rate changed compared with the immediately preceding equal-length window, using the same goal definition as this row.
Provision successProvisioning here means infrastructure setup before E2E tests start. A run counts as provision-successful if it got past provisioning, even if it later failed during E2E. Runs that failed for 'Other' CI-infrastructure reasons are excluded because those runs never reached the provision step. DEV rows use post-good runs plus Tide batches. INT/STG/PROD show n/a because provisioning is not part of those environments.
Provision change vs prevChange in provision success, in percentage points, compared with the previous equal-length window. Uses the same provision-success definition as the Provision success column. DEV only; INT/STG/PROD show n/a.
E2E successAmong runs that reached E2E execution, this shows how many completed successfully. Provision failures and 'Other' CI-infrastructure failures are excluded because those runs never reached the E2E step. DEV rows use only runs after the final push to a PR that later merged. INT/STG/PROD use all E2E job runs.
E2E success vs prevChange in E2E success, in percentage points, compared with the previous equal-length window. Uses the same E2E-success definition as the E2E success column.
DEV95% - Post-good runs + Tide batches38166.93% (off track)-28.07pp+9.12pp77.47% (282/364)+1.94pp90.43% (255/282)+12.26pp
INT95% - All E2E job runs7737.66% (off track)-57.34pp-21.16ppn/an/a38.67% (29/75)-20.16pp
STG95% - All E2E job runs3652.78% (off track)-42.22pp-47.22ppn/an/a55.88% (19/34)-44.12pp
PROD95% - All E2E job runs6459.38% (off track)-35.62pp+26.04ppn/an/a61.29% (38/62)+27.96pp

Environment: DEV

E2E Jobs
729
Success Rate
52.95%
Provision success
Provisioning here means infrastructure setup before E2E tests start. A run counts as provision-successful if it got past provisioning, even if it later failed during E2E. Runs that failed for 'Other' CI-infrastructure reasons are excluded because those runs never reached the provision step.
73.22% (473/646)
E2E success
Among runs that reached E2E execution, this shows how many completed successfully. Provision failures and 'Other' CI-infrastructure failures are excluded because those runs never reached the E2E step.
81.61% (386/473)
E2E Jobs (post-good + batches)
These PR-regression-filtered DEV metrics include runs on the final commit of a PR that later merged, plus Tide batch retests of PRs that passed their individual e2e-parallel checks. Each run counts once. This card shows the number of runs in that DEV-only goal basis.
381
Success Rate (post-good + batches)
These PR-regression-filtered DEV metrics include runs on the final commit of a PR that later merged, plus Tide batch retests of PRs that passed their individual e2e-parallel checks. Each run counts once. This card shows the overall success rate for that DEV-only goal basis.
66.93%
Provision success (post-good + batches)
These PR-regression-filtered DEV metrics include runs on the final commit of a PR that later merged, plus Tide batch retests of PRs that passed their individual e2e-parallel checks. Each run counts once. Provisioning here means infrastructure setup before E2E tests start. A run counts as provision-successful if it got past provisioning, even if it later failed during E2E. Runs that failed for 'Other' CI-infrastructure reasons are excluded because those runs never reached the provision step.
77.47% (282/364)
E2E success (post-good + batches)
These PR-regression-filtered DEV metrics include runs on the final commit of a PR that later merged, plus Tide batch retests of PRs that passed their individual e2e-parallel checks. Each run counts once. Among runs that reached E2E execution, this shows how many completed successfully. Provision failures and 'Other' CI-infrastructure failures are excluded because those runs never reached the E2E step.
90.43% (255/282)

Daily Run Outcomes

Successful runs Provision failures E2E failures Other failures
64 runs
28%Successful runs: 18 of 64 runs (28.1%)
61%Provision failures: 39 of 64 runs (60.9%)
E2E failures: 6 of 64 runs (9.4%)
Other failures: 1 of 64 runs (1.6%)
68 runs
38%Successful runs: 26 of 68 runs (38.2%)
34%Provision failures: 23 of 68 runs (33.8%)
E2E failures: 7 of 68 runs (10.3%)
18%Other failures: 12 of 68 runs (17.6%)
86 runs
44%Successful runs: 38 of 86 runs (44.2%)
45%Provision failures: 39 of 86 runs (45.3%)
E2E failures: 6 of 86 runs (7.0%)
Other failures: 3 of 86 runs (3.5%)
60 runs
65%Successful runs: 39 of 60 runs (65.0%)
27%Provision failures: 16 of 60 runs (26.7%)
E2E failures: 3 of 60 runs (5.0%)
Other failures: 2 of 60 runs (3.3%)
56 runs
77%Successful runs: 43 of 56 runs (76.8%)
16%E2E failures: 9 of 56 runs (16.1%)
Other failures: 4 of 56 runs (7.1%)
15 runs
93%Successful runs: 14 of 15 runs (93.3%)
Other failures: 1 of 15 runs (6.7%)
0 runs
No runs
64 runs
36%Successful runs: 23 of 64 runs (35.9%)
42%Provision failures: 27 of 64 runs (42.2%)
E2E failures: 5 of 64 runs (7.8%)
14%Other failures: 9 of 64 runs (14.1%)
86 runs
53%Successful runs: 46 of 86 runs (53.5%)
15%Provision failures: 13 of 86 runs (15.1%)
19%E2E failures: 16 of 86 runs (18.6%)
13%Other failures: 11 of 86 runs (12.8%)
60 runs
45%Successful runs: 27 of 60 runs (45.0%)
Provision failures: 4 of 60 runs (6.7%)
23%E2E failures: 14 of 60 runs (23.3%)
25%Other failures: 15 of 60 runs (25.0%)
72 runs
61%Successful runs: 44 of 72 runs (61.1%)
Provision failures: 5 of 72 runs (6.9%)
13%E2E failures: 9 of 72 runs (12.5%)
19%Other failures: 14 of 72 runs (19.4%)
64 runs
67%Successful runs: 43 of 64 runs (67.2%)
Provision failures: 3 of 64 runs (4.7%)
17%E2E failures: 11 of 64 runs (17.2%)
Other failures: 7 of 64 runs (10.9%)
19 runs
84%Successful runs: 16 of 19 runs (84.2%)
Provision failures: 2 of 19 runs (10.5%)
Other failures: 1 of 19 runs (5.3%)
15 runs
60%Successful runs: 9 of 15 runs (60.0%)
Provision failures: 2 of 15 runs (13.3%)
E2E failures: 1 of 15 runs (6.7%)
Other failures: 3 of 15 runs (20.0%)

Daily Run Outcomes for DEV Goal Basis (post-good + batches)

Successful runs (post-good + batches) Provision failures E2E failures Other failures
35 runs
40%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 14 of 35 runs (40.0%)
57%Provision failures: 20 of 35 runs (57.1%)
E2E failures: 1 of 35 runs (2.9%)
35 runs
46%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 16 of 35 runs (45.7%)
40%Provision failures: 14 of 35 runs (40.0%)
E2E failures: 1 of 35 runs (2.9%)
Other failures: 4 of 35 runs (11.4%)
47 runs
60%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 28 of 47 runs (59.6%)
36%Provision failures: 17 of 47 runs (36.2%)
E2E failures: 2 of 47 runs (4.3%)
37 runs
70%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 26 of 37 runs (70.3%)
27%Provision failures: 10 of 37 runs (27.0%)
E2E failures: 1 of 37 runs (2.7%)
34 runs
88%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 30 of 34 runs (88.2%)
E2E failures: 3 of 34 runs (8.8%)
Other failures: 1 of 34 runs (2.9%)
9 runs
100%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 9 of 9 runs (100.0%)
0 runs
No runs
36 runs
44%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 16 of 36 runs (44.4%)
44%Provision failures: 16 of 36 runs (44.4%)
E2E failures: 1 of 36 runs (2.8%)
Other failures: 3 of 36 runs (8.3%)
39 runs
77%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 30 of 39 runs (76.9%)
Provision failures: 2 of 39 runs (5.1%)
E2E failures: 2 of 39 runs (5.1%)
13%Other failures: 5 of 39 runs (12.8%)
23 runs
65%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 15 of 23 runs (65.2%)
22%E2E failures: 5 of 23 runs (21.7%)
Other failures: 3 of 23 runs (13.0%)
32 runs
91%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 29 of 32 runs (90.6%)
E2E failures: 3 of 32 runs (9.4%)
36 runs
78%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 28 of 36 runs (77.8%)
Provision failures: 1 of 36 runs (2.8%)
19%E2E failures: 7 of 36 runs (19.4%)
13 runs
85%Successful runs (post-good + batches): 11 of 13 runs (84.6%)
Provision failures: 1 of 13 runs (7.7%)
Other failures: 1 of 13 runs (7.7%)
5 runs
Successful runs (post-good + batches): 3 of 5 runs (60.0%)
Provision failures: 1 of 5 runs (20.0%)
E2E failures: 1 of 5 runs (20.0%)

Environment: INT

E2E Jobs
77
Success Rate
37.66%
E2E success
Among runs that reached E2E execution, this shows how many completed successfully. Provision failures and 'Other' CI-infrastructure failures are excluded because those runs never reached the E2E step.
38.67% (29/75)

Daily Run Outcomes

Successful runs Provision failures E2E failures Other failures
3 runs
33%Successful runs: 1 of 3 runs (33.3%)
67%E2E failures: 2 of 3 runs (66.7%)
5 runs
60%Successful runs: 3 of 5 runs (60.0%)
40%E2E failures: 2 of 5 runs (40.0%)
7 runs
43%Successful runs: 3 of 7 runs (42.9%)
57%E2E failures: 4 of 7 runs (57.1%)
1 run
100%E2E failures: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)
6 runs
50%Successful runs: 3 of 6 runs (50.0%)
50%E2E failures: 3 of 6 runs (50.0%)
6 runs
67%Successful runs: 4 of 6 runs (66.7%)
33%E2E failures: 2 of 6 runs (33.3%)
3 runs
100%E2E failures: 3 of 3 runs (100.0%)
6 runs
33%Successful runs: 2 of 6 runs (33.3%)
67%E2E failures: 4 of 6 runs (66.7%)
3 runs
33%Successful runs: 1 of 3 runs (33.3%)
67%E2E failures: 2 of 3 runs (66.7%)
9 runs
22%Successful runs: 2 of 9 runs (22.2%)
78%E2E failures: 7 of 9 runs (77.8%)
9 runs
11%Successful runs: 1 of 9 runs (11.1%)
67%E2E failures: 6 of 9 runs (66.7%)
22%Other failures: 2 of 9 runs (22.2%)
8 runs
75%Successful runs: 6 of 8 runs (75.0%)
25%E2E failures: 2 of 8 runs (25.0%)
7 runs
43%Successful runs: 3 of 7 runs (42.9%)
57%E2E failures: 4 of 7 runs (57.1%)
4 runs
100%E2E failures: 4 of 4 runs (100.0%)

Environment: STG

E2E Jobs
36
Success Rate
52.78%
E2E success
Among runs that reached E2E execution, this shows how many completed successfully. Provision failures and 'Other' CI-infrastructure failures are excluded because those runs never reached the E2E step.
55.88% (19/34)

Daily Run Outcomes

Successful runs Provision failures E2E failures Other failures
1 run
100%E2E failures: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)
4 runs
50%Successful runs: 2 of 4 runs (50.0%)
50%E2E failures: 2 of 4 runs (50.0%)
3 runs
33%Successful runs: 1 of 3 runs (33.3%)
67%E2E failures: 2 of 3 runs (66.7%)
1 run
100%Successful runs: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)
3 runs
33%Successful runs: 1 of 3 runs (33.3%)
67%E2E failures: 2 of 3 runs (66.7%)
3 runs
33%Successful runs: 1 of 3 runs (33.3%)
67%E2E failures: 2 of 3 runs (66.7%)
1 run
100%Successful runs: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)
2 runs
50%Successful runs: 1 of 2 runs (50.0%)
50%Other failures: 1 of 2 runs (50.0%)
2 runs
100%Successful runs: 2 of 2 runs (100.0%)
1 run
100%Successful runs: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)
2 runs
50%Successful runs: 1 of 2 runs (50.0%)
50%E2E failures: 1 of 2 runs (50.0%)
4 runs
25%Successful runs: 1 of 4 runs (25.0%)
75%E2E failures: 3 of 4 runs (75.0%)
6 runs
67%Successful runs: 4 of 6 runs (66.7%)
33%E2E failures: 2 of 6 runs (33.3%)
3 runs
67%Successful runs: 2 of 3 runs (66.7%)
33%Other failures: 1 of 3 runs (33.3%)

Environment: PROD

E2E Jobs
64
Success Rate
59.38%
E2E success
Among runs that reached E2E execution, this shows how many completed successfully. Provision failures and 'Other' CI-infrastructure failures are excluded because those runs never reached the E2E step.
61.29% (38/62)

Daily Run Outcomes

Successful runs Provision failures E2E failures Other failures
1 run
E2E failures: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)
3 runs
100%E2E failures: 3 of 3 runs (100.0%)
3 runs
100%E2E failures: 3 of 3 runs (100.0%)
5 runs
Successful runs: 1 of 5 runs (20.0%)
80%E2E failures: 4 of 5 runs (80.0%)
1 run
Successful runs: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)
2 runs
Successful runs: 1 of 2 runs (50.0%)
E2E failures: 1 of 2 runs (50.0%)
9 runs
89%Successful runs: 8 of 9 runs (88.9%)
E2E failures: 1 of 9 runs (11.1%)
1 run
E2E failures: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)
2 runs
Successful runs: 1 of 2 runs (50.0%)
E2E failures: 1 of 2 runs (50.0%)
12 runs
50%Successful runs: 6 of 12 runs (50.0%)
50%E2E failures: 6 of 12 runs (50.0%)
4 runs
50%Successful runs: 2 of 4 runs (50.0%)
50%E2E failures: 2 of 4 runs (50.0%)
10 runs
80%Successful runs: 8 of 10 runs (80.0%)
E2E failures: 1 of 10 runs (10.0%)
Other failures: 1 of 10 runs (10.0%)
10 runs
90%Successful runs: 9 of 10 runs (90.0%)
Other failures: 1 of 10 runs (10.0%)
1 run
Successful runs: 1 of 1 runs (100.0%)