No failure patterns match your search.
Environment: PROD
Failure patterns: 1 · Failures matched: 1 · Total runs: 2 · Runs affected: 1
| Failure patternThe canonical description of a recurring CI failure, extracted and normalized from raw logs. | Failed atThe stage of the job run where this failure occurred: 'provision' (environment setup, DEV only), 'e2e' (test suite execution), or 'other' (CI infrastructure issues that did not produce a failure pattern). | Number of distinct job runs where this failure pattern was detected. | Percentage of all job runs in this environment affected by this failure pattern during the selected window. | Classification of this failure pattern: Regression (likely caused by a specific PR), Flake (intermittent failure spread across days), Noise (low-quality or generic pattern), or Indeterminate. | TrendShows daily activity for this failure pattern in a trailing window anchored to the selected end date. The sparkline covers at least 7 days and at most 14 days, depending on the current window size. | Also inOther environments where the same failure pattern was also detected during the selected window. | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERROR CODE: DeploymentFailed; detail code VaultAlreadyExists; detail message the vault name '<vault-name>' is already in use. Vault names are globally unique so it is possible tha...full failure pattern: ERROR CODE: DeploymentFailed; detail code VaultAlreadyExists; detail message the vault name '<vault-name>' is already in use. Vault names are globally unique so it is possible that the name is already taken. If you are sure that the vault name was not taken then it is possible that a vault with the same name was recently deleted but not purged after being placed in a recoverable state. If the vault is in a recoverable state then the vault will need to be purged before reusing the name. For more information about VaultAlreadyExists, soft delete and purging a vault follow this link <url> Signal: IndeterminateSignal: Indeterminate — no prior history; active 1 day(s) — New failure pattern — no prior history | e2e | 1 | 50.00%1 of 2 job runs affected | IndeterminateSignal: Indeterminate — no prior history; active 1 day(s) — New failure pattern — no prior history | Show trend detailsJun 23: 0 · Jun 24: 0 · Jun 25: 0 · Jun 26: 0 · Jun 27: 0 · Jun 28: 0 · Jun 29: 1 | none | ||||||||||||||
Full failure examples (1)fail [github.com/Azure/ARO-HCP/test/e2e/cluster_autoscaling.go:88]: failed to create customer resources for autoscaling cluster
Unexpected error:
<*fmt.wrapError | 0xc0008b3380>:
failed to create customer-infra: failed waiting for deployment "customer-infra-autoscaling-hcp-cluster-zznhms" in resourcegroup="autoscaling-cluster-jzz264" to finish: GET https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/resourcegroups/autoscaling-cluster-jzz264/providers/Microsoft.Resources/deployments/customer-infra-autoscaling-hcp-cluster-zznhms/operationStatuses/08584188326625955293
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESPONSE 200: 200 OK
ERROR CODE: DeploymentFailed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
"status": "Failed",
"error": {
"code": "DeploymentFailed",
"message": "At least one resource deployment operation failed. Please list deployment operations for details. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-deployment-operations for usage details.",
"details": [
{
"code": "Conflict",
"message": "{\r\n \"error\": {\r\n \"code\": \"VaultAlreadyExists\",\r\n \"message\": \"The vault name 'cust-kv-ljrmjtkjzfdwc' is already in use. Vault names are globally unique so it is possible that the name is already taken. If you are sure that the vault name was not taken then it is possible that a vault with the same name was recently deleted but not purged after being placed in a recoverable state. If the vault is in a recoverable state then the vault will need to be purged before reusing the name. For more information about VaultAlreadyExists, soft delete and purging a vault follow this link https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2147740.\"\r\n }\r\n}"
}
]
}
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...
occurred
fail [github.com/Azure/ARO-HCP/test/e2e/cluster_autoscaling.go:88]: failed to create customer resources for autoscaling cluster
Unexpected error:
<*fmt.wrapError | 0xc0008b3380>:
failed to create customer-infra: failed waiting for deployment "customer-infra-autoscaling-hcp-cluster-zznhms" in resourcegroup="autoscaling-cluster-jzz264" to finish: GET https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/resourcegroups/autoscaling-cluster-jzz264/providers/Microsoft.Resources/deployments/customer-infra-autoscaling-hcp-cluster-zznhms/operationStatuses/08584188326625955293
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESPONSE 200: 200 OK
ERROR CODE: DeploymentFailed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
"status": "Failed",
"error": {
"code": "DeploymentFailed",
"message": "At least one resource deployment operation failed. Please list deployment operations for details. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-deployment-operations for usage details.",
"details": [
{
"code": "Conflict",
"message": "{\r\n \"error\": {\r\n \"code\": \"VaultAlreadyExists\",\r\n \"message\": \"The vault name 'cust-kv-ljrmjtkjzfdwc' is already in use. Vault names are globally unique so it is possible that the name is already taken. If you are sure that the vault name was not taken then it is possible that a vault with the same name was recently deleted but not purged after being placed in a recoverable state. If the vault is in a recoverable state then the vault will need to be purged before reusing the name. For more information about VaultAlreadyExists, soft delete and purging a vault follow this link https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2147740.\"\r\n }\r\n}"
}
]
}
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...
occurredContributing tests (1)
Affected runs (1)
| ||||||||||||||||||||